Here's some ideas I've been kicking around.
Question: Just how do the different alien races design their
control panels. We kinda take it for granted that they are
different, but just how different are they? For simplicity's
sake I just took a look at pilot stations.
SOLOMANI (start off simple right?)
Solomani (and most Imperial) flight controls generally
consist of stick, throttle, and rudder pedals. The stick is
usually mounted in the center of the console, but is sometimes on
the left side, while the right hand generally controls the
throttle. This allows the co-pilot or navigator (generally
seated on the right) to be able to reach the throttle. If the
pilot were incapacitated, the co-pilot can easily take control.
If the stick is on the left side, it and the throttle are mounted
in the arms of the acceleration couch. This allows the pilot to
rest his arms on the chair. This can be nice when you don't have
inertial compensators working.
On most ships, especially fighters, all combat funtions are
mounted on the stick and throttle. This allows a pilot to
conduct all combat operations without having to move his hands to
different controls. This design philosophy is known as HOTAS.
(Hands On Throttle And Stick)
Darrians tend to use Solomani control design philosophy,
though with a greater emphisis on center mounted sticks. This is
because of the high proportion of ambidextrousness and left
handedness in Darrian gene pools.
VILANI
Vilani controls are a bit more automated. Auto pilots tend
to be a bit more sophisticated (and are heavily relied on) The
control lay out is on the clumsy side. Engineers opted for a
single design to ease training of pilots and to avoid their
having to study their ship to understand what is going on. Thus
the same control panel exists on the Vilani Fat Trader as exists
on their most sophisticated fighters. The compromise design is
good, but any compromise in engineering tends to lessen
performance.
Vilani attitude controls look like a cross bettween a
control yoke and motorcycle handle bars. Rudder pedals are not
present as they are in Solomani designs, and yaw control is
linked to the handle bars. The bars control yaw in a similar
manner to motorcycle bars. (This makes a cross controlled 'slip'
maneuver somewhat more difficult in Vilani aircraft) But it
simplifies the controls for most normal flights. The throttle is
mounted on the left handle bar as if it were a motorcycle.
ZHODANI
Almost all Zhodani pilots come from the noble ranks. Flight
controls for their ships are open for flicking. Thus the psi-
trained Zhodani pilot may change the ship's attitude, throttle
settings, and weapons by flicking. Special safe guards are in
place to prevent outside psionic interference in the piloting of
the ship. Up to and including a psi-shield surrounding the
pilot's station. This is demonstrated in the Shivva class patrol
frigate and her fighters. The fighter pilots are open to
telepathic contact from their flight controller, but the flight
controller can not affect flight controls of the fighter.
There also exist manual controls for all craft. Not all
pilots are nobles. The enlisted pilots use the manual controls.
Also proles operating grav vehicles and the like have a need for
manual controls. While one would think that manual flight
controls would be of lesser quality because of the depencance on
psi-controls, this is far from the truth. With their wealth of
insight into the human mind, data presentation among the Zhodani
is a fine art. Screens with flight data are very well presented
in such a manner so as not to swamp the pilot with data.
However, manual controls do tend to recieve secondary attention
in Zhodani cockpit design.
Controls are generally mounted on the arms of the flight
acceleration couch. The stick is generally mounted on the left,
and the throttle on the right. Often times, with a Psionic pilot
in command, the controls are stowed inside the chair arms and,
with a press of a switch, can be deployed in emergencies.
Yaw control is subsumed into the stick in a rotational
manner. Turn the stick to the right and the ship yaws right.
This last is a reflection of how manual flight controls are
considered secondary.
VARGR
Vargr flight controls do not follow general lines making it
difficult to generalize. But, their control systems tend to be
similar to human designs at least where hands are concerned.
Their degitigrade stance makes their foot controls quite
different. Rudder pedals are rare, and yaw control tends to be
absorbed into the stick as Vilani and Zhodani designs.
Aslan control systems are sometimes copied by Vargr.
ASLAN
Aslan flight controls are a set of half gloves set into the
arms of the acceleration couch. They look somewhat like large
balls on the ends of the chair arms. The hand is placed atop the
ball in deep indentations in it for the hand. (Picture a big wax
ball with a hole the shape of your hand melted into it.) (Rather
like Hiver controls with deeper indendations)
This design meshes with the Aslan philosophy that the ship
is but an extension of the pilot. The 'gloves' make the ship
part of him. The ship follows the motion of the hand. The
extension of the dew-claw fires the ships weapons on ship's where
the pilot is in control of the guns. A similar control is for
the aiming and firing of ship's weapons.
Attitude control is controlled by both hands on separate
controls. With roll and pitch on one hand and yaw on the other.
Throttle control is in foot pedals.
DROYNE
Droyne controls are one of the most unusual. Attitude
controls are mounted beside the pilot. They are low level infra-
red sensors that sense the position of the pilot's wings and
tail. Though the Droyne generally have great difficulty in
flying, they do still possess the equipment for rudimentary
flight, and the instincts to do so(though buried). To raise the
nose of the ship, the pilot would increase the angle of attack of
his wings. The sensors see the change in wing angle and perform
the maneuver. If the pilot raises his right wing, the ship will
bank left, and so on.
Throttle controls are more conventional: a lever mounted in
the center of the panel.
The Ael Yael, while unable to build ships will commonly
adapt control panels to this type of configuration.
HIVER
The Hiver controls are balls mounted with control studs.
This is the form best suited 'ergonomically` to their limbs.
Hiver controls are very difficult for anyone but a hiver to
operate. Thus, many of their ships employ dual control panels,
to allow for a member race to use them. The Federation Member
control panels are similar to Aslan designs, though the
indentation in the control globes is not so deep as the Aslan
half gloves. This arrangement allows the hiver better control
than he would mangage with a Solomani design.
K'KREE
The K'Kree have probably the most bazarre arrangement of
attitude control. The pilot lies in a couch arrangement with his
four hooves touching the floor. By leaning in one direction or
another, the ship's attitude is changed. It looks somthing like
flying a hang glider. To roll left, lean left. To lower the
nose: lean forward. To pull up: lean back. Yaw control is by
twisting the body to the right or left. Throttle control is by
hand levers.
The leaning method of attitude control dates back to the
earliest K'kree experiments in flight. Their earliest gliders
used this method of steering, then their primitive aircraft.
After that, it was too entrenched in K'kree engineering
philosophy to ever change.
Mr. Scott