3D starmap database

A thread of 3 messages, 4 March 1993 to 9 March 1993, in the order they were sent.

#5260 3D starmap database

I am one of those people that likes realism in his space campaign.

In regards to that I like the idea of a 3D starmap and I use the 2300AD
map, but of course, I have wanted a larger 3D map.  I am in the process
of converting the "Machine Readable Version of the Catalogue of Stars
within 25 Parsecs" to use in a database.

For those of you not familar with the catalogue, its on finet somewhere in
Finland.  There are 2150 records, each 135 bytes long, containing up to 44
pieces of information on stars within a sphere around our sun , 25 parsecs
in radius.

I have put the file into Excel and exploded each 135 byte record to tis
its components.  I have then set up a database (Access) to receive the
information.  My own goal is to have a file containing the coordinates
(preferably cartesian for simplicity) for display in other programs, and a
file containing information like magnitude , type of star , etc.  This
would be inthe same format as the 2300AD starmap, Near Star List"

The database will allow users to look at stars in a particular area of
space, or a type of star, or whatever information you put on it.. ie,
something to store campaign information in .  One possibility would be to
store political allegiencies, navy sizes, trade types.

This is being done on a PC, in Windows, and I will make it available to
everyone onthe group, but I have a problem.  I want to make a starmap that
would give an accurate location for a star at the time of my campaign (2203
AD).  I don't know how to use some of the data.  It gives declination, and
right assencsion for each star, but there is such things as:annual proper
motion, radial velocity, U component fo space velocity relative to Sun, V,
and W components, Box orbit parameters w, e, and i.

Its fairly obvious to me that all I need to do is use one set of these
numbers, specifically the velocities to determine the star's position in
2203.  However, I have a few questions:

1) How do the U,V, and W components relate to the declination?
2) What re the box orbit parameters relation to U,V,W and the
RA/declination?

3) How does parallax play a role in these numbers?
  I am aware that parsecs (3.34 ly per parsec ) are the recipricol of
parallax, and the error in parallax increases the farther out you go.

  What I need advice on is which of these sets of numbers to use, if more
than one set is given for a particular star?  Also, do I need to worry
about the orientation of the dec with respect to the sign of the number when
I convert to spherical coordinates?  The data is given is positive or
negative numbers, and I am wondering how this relates to the other
parameters given?  Since this is not that difficult to calculate and
compare numbers on my own, I would like to know what other people know
about this subject or whether they have done their own calculations.  It
wouldn't matter if I just used RA and decl, since I can arbitrarily set my
axis anywhere, but I want to know for consistency , how the other parametsr
relate to this.

  Secondly, I want to know if I need to modify this data with regards to:
precession, geocentric parallax correction on RA/DEC and atmospheric
refraction?

  If so , what are the equations?

  There is not that much data in the file on each star, and once I have the
information it would not be that difficult to plot all the points, or have
the database select a section of the sphere and just plot that.

  I would really appreciate it if someone would take one set of numbers,
whether real or not, and show me the relationship between them.

  Hopefully I can get this done fairly quickly, post it, and go on to other
things.   By the way, anyone use the database ability of Excel?  What do
you think of it?

Steven B. Fellows
[email removed]

PS: The current size of the Excel file is about 4.5 megs up from 300 k from
the original datafile.  The database sits at about 580 K, but that is just
a table of the data, with no forms yet.  The ultimate goal, is to have:

1) Star number (field index)
2) X coordinate
3) Y coordinate
4) Z coordinate
5) Luminosity
6) Magnitude
7) Spectral type

There is also something called B-V color and U-B color.  I would assume
this is either related to redshift, or spectral type.. any ideas?

PPS: If Jack Dietz is reading this list... ( can 't remember if my
correspondence on this subject is from here, or from NetNews), how are you
doing on your project related to this?

#5276 Two "S-words" ...

[email removed] (FELLOWS STEVEN B) writes:
> I am one of those people that likes realism in his space campaign.

I can agree with that!

> I am in the process
> of converting the "Machine Readable Version of the Catalogue of Stars
> within 25 Parsecs" to use in a database.
> For those of you not familar with the catalogue, its on finet somewhere in
> Finland.  There are 2150 records, each 135 bytes long, containing up to 44
> pieces of information on stars within a sphere around our sun , 25 parsecs
> in radius.

Could you possibly make the raw file available (or give an FTP site
and file name/path where I could pick it up from)?


[email removed] (metlay) writes:
> Sigh. I suppose I can work up a new and comprehensive sex-and-naughty-bits
> post for the Vargr and Aslan, but I do have to wonder what GDW and the
> Keith Brothers, who created the Aslan, would say about some of the more,
> erm, UNORTHODOX conclusions I've postulated. If there isn't much general
> curiosity, I may prepare a file to email directly to interested parties.
> Otherwise I can do a general post to the TML, but like my Traveller erotica,
> I am just not sure it's appropriate for distribution here....

Well, appropriate or not (do we have any children reading this list?  I
don't think so) it'd probably be of more interest to a larger fraction
of the list than the current discussion of particle physics ... (not
that I don't like physics discussions, but this one seems to be getting
a little esoteric even for this group).

If you don't want to post the material on the TML, perhaps you could
distribute it to the interested parties via mail?


[email removed]
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                 Science-Fiction Adventure
                                                         in the Far Future

#5278 Star Data on ames.arc.nasa.gov

Derek Wildstar writes:
> Could you possibly make the raw file available (or give an FTP site
> and file name/path where I could pick it up from)?

I found my copy on ames.arc.nasa.gov, path pub/SPACE/FAQ, files stars.data
(raw data file) and stars.doc (explanation).  I have massaged my version
somewhat, and I can upload a copy with rectangular coordinates (to twenty
decimal places, even though two is overkill) and some hand-entered information
if someone is willing to keep it at their ftp site.

If you have access to a friendly local university physical science library,
look for the book.  It has more catalog numbers, notes on most of the binary
star systems, and a better explanation of the individual values than the
online copy does.  The book is 'Royal Observatory Annals Number 5: Catalogue
of Stars within twenty-five parsecs of the Sun' (sic), author Sir Richard
Woolley & co.

Jack Dietz
// [email removed]
// [email removed]