Palmer T. Davis · 8 November 1993 · reply to #6304
>Date: Thu, 4 Nov 93 11:49:38 GMT+4622364:40
>From: [email removed] (Goldman of Chaos -- postmaster CRI-US)
>
>I've had a change of opinion about the viability
>of the TNE virus. This is a result of the recent
>successful attack on a number of computers I'm
>responsible for. Everything is under control now;
>however, we were disconnected from the internet
>for a few days while we sorted things out.
I don't have problems with the concept of a destructive virus
in Traveller. I don't even have problems with the concept of
such a virus getting through the presumably excellent defenses
that a TL-15 society would develop in response to having been
exposed to other vires at various points in its development.
However, the idea of an unrecoverable virus that affects everyone
is indefensible. And even if you fudge things enough to make
such a beast possible, the details of the TNE virus are still
not believeable
T0_begin with, any high tech so{ ciety would al=&st certainly
have been exposed to virus attacks of a degr!@# of so
phistication
worthy of that society's technology before, and developed d#fen$,;
Smart, self-ad{AS%GHB=~`
@$ABAEF8m3B
0J<O`F'_``!29$'Y``&!%"\P+@!A_P``(_A03UA/4H)R'[*";`#_7DAY
``%MOV'_```CWD*Y``&`B$SN!`S_]$Y>3G5.5@``("X`"$JY``&`B&<:0KD``8"(
2'D``8"88?_ which unless the operators were really stupid __^UH8?\``%+
46$\O`&'_!/_38$Y>3G5.5O_P2.<X`"@N``AOF6Y
!G(?LH1L#DAY``%MQV
'_``!9D%A/)CD$`06P2'@`#&'_``!$4")`0?D``8$4
qqq
(K!.`$*I``A(>``!+PE(>0`!;"!A_P``6X0D/``!;"!(;O_P+P)(
>``#8?____B*2'@``4'Y``&V4" incompatible machinery from different
manu\P3`!A_P``8T;nd tech levels wouldn't>_``@
+KP````!
)A
_P``7;YA____+P
^*HCPP0!!;!,[@`<_^1.7DYU3E8``$Y>3G5.5@``2.<X("1N``@
H+@`,2'D``);T(`[email removed]`\``&VT"\`8?\``%7B)@`O"F'_```@^B!`((-"J``$2'@``TAY
``%MUB\*8?\$_]WVWOP`&$J`9G)!^0`!;
\2$K(09A@O""\*8?\$_]V<4$]*
@&8(<@$CP0`!@(AT`4'Y``&! over a communications channel! Why
would %"!P+@`2$+(29C0O"B\(8?\$_]UR4$]*@&8D
0?D``;90(8,L`$J$9@9(>``!8`9(>0``45@O`F'_``!0B manual override F`
(4H)R'[*";+1, is only common sen[@0<__!
.7DYU3E8``"\++PHF;@`(2&L``V'_```(TEA/[email removed]+B\`8?\``"`X
)$!"DB\++PMA_P3_W3183U*`+[email removed]``0^0N@&'_!/_=`B5```0D;O_X)F[__$Y>3G5.5@``
+PHO`B0
N``@O.0`!R%0O`F'_```?J"
1`4$]*BF8$0H!@1DJ2
9P0@$F`^2JH`!&<R+RH`!"\"8?\```HD4$]*@
&<22'D``);T+[email removed]``5)`D hope, Loren, that you folks at GDW don't
expect us to beli@&`4+RH`!&'_``!#VD*J``0@/``!MM`D+O_X)&[__$Y>3G5.5@``+P
HO`B0N
``@O.0`!R%0O`F'_`` of well-done examples of this like _@001_&
nd _A_Fire_Upon_`?,"1`4$]*BF8$0H!@&DJJ``od. Not for a minute would
1F$"\2+P)A_P```?@E
0``$8`0
@*@`$)"[_^"1N__Q.7 DYU3E8``"\*+P(D;@`(=`%!^0`!@10@<"X`
$A"R$F96+PHO"&'_!/_;]%!/[email removed]'Y st of all is that it completely
ruins the spirit of _Travell``&V4$*P+`!R`[*"9QIM"'("LH)G
"F`@<@^R@F<28!@O.0`!@(Q@$B\Y``&`D&`*+SD``8"48`)"IR\"8?\``$[J4$]2@G(?L
H)LDD'Y``%MOQ([email removed]%B\(+PIA_P3_VXI03TJ`9@9"N0`!@(@O:-)
- --
Palmer T. Davis ___ UN-altered REPRODUCTION and DISSEMINATION of
[email removed] \X/ this IMPORTANT Information is ENCOURAGED.