On tranqs and non-lethal weapons

By Jim Cheetham ·

TML message #1185From bundle 101

	Hmmm, tranqs, huh ?
	Well, lets look at a couple of ways they've been used in fiction
	and real-life in recent history ...

	First of all we have the wide-area gas effects. Mainly inhaled,
	usually pretty dangerous, these are quite effective. The aim of
	most of these is to tranquilise in the broadest sense of the
	word - to render ineffective. Tear gas, light doses of war gases,
	anything that produces a disabling affect on the targets. If there
	are any serious side-effects, well, too bad. (The Stumm gas used
	by the Mega-City Judges has a 1 in a thousand death rate - perfectly
	acceptable for crowd control where you can be sure that they *all*
	have broken the law ... however, just a little *too* dangerous
	for even the Judges to use routinely :-)

	Next we want to look at the tranqs that are a little more selective
	in their targeting ...
	So, we have small gas grenades, that, when delivered *accurately*,
	only affect a few targets ... but they are affected grately by
	environmental effects (like a strong wind ...) And of course,
	the basic gas type is still the same as the ones above.
	Next up are the skin-absorbed chemicals (and if you've ever
	played paintball, you'll know just how easy it is for the stuff
	to pass through many layers of clothes) - but still the same
	arguments apply as to side-effects etc.

	So, we have to be very selective to ensure that the materiel gets
	delivered - and you see the sort of dart guns that African big-game
	hunters seem keen on sticking into rhinos ... these darts deliver
	a very large dose as quickly as possible, so if the dart gets
	brushed off by a charging rhino, it will still eventually fall over.
	Unfortunately, these darts can have a lot of side-effects related
	to the fact that they are very physical - get hit in the eye by
	one of those and you won't notice the tranq chemicals - you'll
	be dead. Also, they are very susceptible to simply not penetrating
	a tough outer layer if they hit at an angle - a common complaint
	with many missile weapons (but not nukes ... :-)

	Some very nice high-tech solutions to these common problems have
	been put forward - I draw mainly on Larry Niven's works here, for
	describing what amounts to TL8 and above.
	First of all we have needle-thin slivers of frozen/soluble tranq
	chemicals (which, is not made clear) fired at high speeds with
	powerful Gauss guns (the chemicals are assumed to have a high
	enough iron content to need no other delivery agent) that break
	the skin easily (being so small) and then dissolve directly into
	the blood stream. The slivers are so small that any that hit
	sensitive areas (such as the eyes) will cause minimal damage,
	and any that encounter normal clothing will be able to easily
	penetrate the weave of the material. The chemical itself must
	be similar to the non-overdosing ones mentioned by Metlay, as
	the basic idea is to pump your target full of them until you're
	sure you've hit him ...

	Then we have the non-chemical methods - ultra-sound stunners
	being the best method. I'm sure you've all noticed how sound
	vibration can have strange effects on the body - the basic
	function of the stunners is to make the central nervous system
	shut down into unconciousness. There are no chemical side-effects,
	and by quickly running up and down the frequency ranges that are
	effective on different species and races, a universal humane
	weapon can be quickly developed.

	Finally, we have what an intelligent victim will realise to be
	the most dangerous weapon of all ... the tasp, which directly
	stimulates the brain's pleasure centre by induction (OK, I know
	that induction isn't a direct method, but I mean that you're
	bypassing the normal routes to the pleasure centre). While the
	stimulation is going on, the victim is completely incapable of
	anything, and is experiencing the most *pleasurable* sensations
	possible. This can quickly lead to addiction to the source of
	stimulation, and only the most intelligent victim could correctly
	understand the threat of addiction, and what that would mean to
	his life. For more information on that, you are advised to read
	the stories that Niven has written dealing with Direct Current
	Stimulation Addiction (The Ringworld Engineers being the best).

	And as a final note, which methods are suitable to combat when
	enclosed in sealed suits (in space, hostile environments etc) ?
	Well, the stunners fail in space, and be less effective in thin
	atmospheres as they rely on transmission of vibrations, and the
	tasp could easily fail is the victim's suit acted as a Faraday
	Cage, keeping out all electro-magnetic radiations ... The sliver
	guns couldn't penetrate even light armour ...
	Are we left to consider psionic attack as the only non-lethal
	tranq effective left ?

	Anyway, I hope that this missive has introduced a few more ideas
	into the discussion of tranqs and non-lethal weapons ...
	Comments please !

[ Note for Larry Niven fans in the London area - he'll be in Hamwicks bookshop
  in Kingston-upon-Thames on Tuesday 10 April, from 12.30 till 1.30 with
  Steven Barnes signing copies of the Barsoom Project - -sequel to Dream
  Park, I think ...]
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
     _____               (JANET) [email removed]
    (__ __) O  ______    (local) [email removed]
   (____)  (_)(_)()(_)   (voice) (+44) 1 549 1366 x2690
   Jim Cheetham, ISD Kingston Polytechnic.
   "... nuke the site from orbit. It's the only way to be sure."
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------