Re: Test of TML
In reply to #1286 Test of TML by James T Perkins
Hi folks! There were two problems with last night's digest. One was that there were two copies of each message. The other is that the digest id skipped from V4#5 to V4#7 without anyone ever receiving V4#6. Both of these problems were my fault directly -- V4#6 didn't get sent out at all, so I put everything back, fixed the bug in the digesting program, and tried to resend the digest, expecting that all would be well and that it would be numbered V4#6. I had forgotten to clean up the temporary message staging area (hence a second copy of all messages) and reset the digest id (hence the jump from #5 to #7). I do not expect these problems to recur, nor should the biweekly folks see anything amiss. Looks like the TML has pretty much successfully moved. Oh, one other administrivia point... Somehow a stray message (was listed in the archive index as number 1253, but actually was not stamped with an Archive-Message-Number) got into the TML archives. The automatically-generated TML archive index (bundle 104) contains an extra message that was not part of real TML traffic. I am working with Dan Corrin (who manages the TML FTP site) to fix his copy of the index, but any of you who have a copy of the index I have sent since April 24th may be in error. James - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Traveller Mailing List Administrator James T Perkins @ Tektronix, Inc [email removed] Beaverton, Oregon, USA [email removed] "Load Auto/Evade, Beowulf!"