Re: (1522) High TL 'iron sights', et.al.
In reply to #1522 High TL 'iron sights', et.al. by Mark F. Cook
Cites: #1522
Look, Ma! Dueling attribution lines! Get the banjo. ;-) In message 1522, [email removed] (Mark F. Cook) writes: > >In message 1510, [email removed] (Brent L. Woods) writes: > >> In message 1509 [email removed] (Mark F. Cook) writes: >> > >> >I'm a pretty good marksman, too, if I do say so myself... :-) >> > >> >I, too, think of myself as "a pretty good marksman" >> ^^^^^ >> I can show you my targets. Honest. I killed them all fair and >>square... ;-) > >I didn't mean to suggest that you were over-stating your skill, Brent. >I just meant that my opinion of my own marksmanship is very subjective: >my deer drop when I shoot at them and bottles shatter (most of the time) >when I aim at them. God knows what kind of damage I could do if I actually >started using ammunition. :-) Doing more than scaring things to death? ;-) >>>> Jarhead training, eh? ;-) ;-) >>> >>>As a former member of an Elite Fighting Force, consisting mostly of >>>highly-trained, knuckle-dragging men with no neck and one eye-brow, >>>I feel I must warn you that ANY derogatory or disparraging remarks >>>you make, containing words of more than one syllable, will almost >>>certainly be mis-understood :-). >> >> Shame on you. Damn' near fell out of chair from that one. > >Ah-ha!! Humor as a weapon!! This is good. It means that everything >the Piranha brothers taught me is working!!! :-) You too? Gee, I went to high school with Dinsdale. Heard from 'em lately? ;-) >Long ago, I came to the conclusion that the Corps is no place for an >intellectual, One of the reasons my friend is leaving the Corps. He wants to get a degree so he can go back as an officer. I think prolonged exposure causes brain damage... ;-) >> Aw... Life's too important to take seriously. ;-) No 'fence, >>eh? ;-) I'm entitled--I'm one of them Navy types... > >That's OK. Two of my best friends are cabbies...er, ah... ex-Navy types. >Somebody's got to drive the boat. :-) That's "ship," if you please. I want to stay *above* the surface thank you... ;-) >Anyway, enough of this 'moochual admiration society' hoo-haw. Let's get >back to the gratuitous sex n' violence. Right. Off we go... >Unfortunately, once this happens (within the context of the game) you >start coming uncomfortably close to treading on the ol' anti-cyborg >sentiment so prevalent throughout the Imperium. Actually, I prefer >to run my campaign with a strong 'cyberpunk' flavor to it, so I tend >to just ignore the 'anti-cyborg' bit and go on my merry way. Anti-cyborg prejudice? Where'd that come from? The only general prejudice that I know of in the Imperium is *anti-psionic*. Where'd they get a problem with cyborgs? - -- Brent INTERNET: [email removed] / USENET: [email removed] FIDONET: [email removed] (from Internet) or Brent Woods@1:201/40.303 (from FidoNet) [address removed]