Planetary Armed Forces
Replies:
- #2204 Re: (2198) Planetary Armed Forces by Robert S. Dean
In a recent note, Robert S. Dean asked whether high-tech worlds would bother having ground forces, since such worlds are not likely to see large ground battles, and whether low-tech worlds would bother having forces at all, since they would not be of much use against attack from higher-tech neighbors. Dealing with the high-tech case first, remember that in the world today most national armies exist with the primary function of either protecting the government from its own citizens or for controlling the government. Very few nations have the ability to conduct protracted military operations beyond their own borders. Thus ground forces for internal security could be very sizeable, and not just in a balkanized situation. Governments in which the military is the final judge of political conflict (a la Chile, Argentina, Brazil), governments where the military is split along political lines and thereby maintains some sort of balance of power (China, perhaps), governments where different military branches are an important part of the federal system (USA), all of these would necesitate sizeable ground forces even if there was no threat from outside. This ignore governments of planets in rebellion and pure military government, as well as feudal government. I myself wondered about the utility of low-tech armed forces for a while, but now think I have a justification for them. They are there to protect the planet from casual interference, not from determined attack. Think about the walls that midieval towns had, and the town levies. Not particularly useful against military attack, but useful against bandits, pirates, and roving vagabonds (i.e. most traveller players). They also perform(ed) an important psychological role when dealing with higher authority, giving the people a certain sense of independence.