GDW Message

By bryan borich ·

TML message #4382From bundle 363Read the whole thread (2 messages)All messages with this subject

Replies:
Item    0237727                 92/06/18        23:32
From:   GDW.SUPPORT                     Loren K. Wiseman
To:     B.BORICH                        Bryan J. Borich
Sub: TML

Bryan,
     Please upload the following to the TML:

 Michael Glew: Yes, GDW would be interested in seeing what your
 group has come up with. Send it either by land mail or via Bryan
 Borich.

 **********

 Lord Krieg: I would like to discuss your comments on the
 T2K/Dark Con D20 system in more detail. We'll be in touch.

 ***********

 Adam Naylor:

 <why did GDW decide to change to Twilght 2000 mechanics?

 We think it is a good set of mechanics, and we see no reason to
 continually re-invent the wheel each time we do a new RPG.
 (Dangerous Journeys is the exception that proves the rule).

 **********

 R. Dired:

 <It was comforting to know that GDW doesn't want any substantive
 <imput for its new T2000 in Space...err, TNE.

 When did I say I GDW didn't want input? I said we weren't
 interested in outside DESIGNERS (We've had very bad luck with
 outside designers). I said we didn't want huge documents, and
 urged people to brevity. And I also said (and this seems to be
 what ticks you off the most) that we were definitely,
 absolutely, positively going with the T2K mechanics.

 I say again: what we DO want are constructive criticism,
 and a few people who are willing to do reality checks for us.
 We want to know what you liked/didn't like about the old (Pre
 MT) rules, ditto for the MT rules, and ditto for the T2K
 mechanics.

 Perhaps you can answer this: If you do nothing but heap
 abuse on us, why should we pay attention to you?

 Loren K. Wiseman
=END=