GDW Message
Replies:
- #4415 GDW message by bryan borich
Item 0237727 92/06/18 23:32
From: GDW.SUPPORT Loren K. Wiseman
To: B.BORICH Bryan J. Borich
Sub: TML
Bryan,
Please upload the following to the TML:
Michael Glew: Yes, GDW would be interested in seeing what your
group has come up with. Send it either by land mail or via Bryan
Borich.
**********
Lord Krieg: I would like to discuss your comments on the
T2K/Dark Con D20 system in more detail. We'll be in touch.
***********
Adam Naylor:
<why did GDW decide to change to Twilght 2000 mechanics?
We think it is a good set of mechanics, and we see no reason to
continually re-invent the wheel each time we do a new RPG.
(Dangerous Journeys is the exception that proves the rule).
**********
R. Dired:
<It was comforting to know that GDW doesn't want any substantive
<imput for its new T2000 in Space...err, TNE.
When did I say I GDW didn't want input? I said we weren't
interested in outside DESIGNERS (We've had very bad luck with
outside designers). I said we didn't want huge documents, and
urged people to brevity. And I also said (and this seems to be
what ticks you off the most) that we were definitely,
absolutely, positively going with the T2K mechanics.
I say again: what we DO want are constructive criticism,
and a few people who are willing to do reality checks for us.
We want to know what you liked/didn't like about the old (Pre
MT) rules, ditto for the MT rules, and ditto for the T2K
mechanics.
Perhaps you can answer this: If you do nothing but heap
abuse on us, why should we pay attention to you?
Loren K. Wiseman
=END=