With regard to Mike and Scott asking about the amount of prurience
to place into their stories I'd like to say "go for it". May reasons:
1. I think we're all at least 16 or 17 years old (as a lower bound).
2. This is a private list, not a public newsgroup.
3. The aim here is meaningful (?) literature rather than titilation.
(At least Mike says he posts his juicy stuff to the alt.* area.)
We could just use the burst program James made--the one that turns
the digest into independent messages, and ask writers to add a descriptive
thing to their subject. That is, if the subject says "STORY" in it,
it, we know what it is. We could make a "STORY-XXX" if it gets "bad" (good?)
enough and those uninterested could just deleted them without reading
them.
- --
Richard Johnson [email removed]
Qui custodii ipsos custodes?