Fluid Trade Class & Ellipsoidal Worlds
In reply to #5206 Fluid trade class errata by Mark Watson
Replies:
- #5212 Ellipsoidal planets by timothy k istian soholt
Mark Watson [email removed] writes: >Fluid Trade Classification: >"Page 50, Step 6 (correction): Trade classifications, Fl line should be >Atmos A+, Hydro 1+, Size entry should be '-'." >This appears both in the sunbane errata and in the E&C published in >Challenge #36. Ooops. I wasn't even aware that the table was repreated on page 50. When I looked at the sunbane errata, I was looking under page 25, where it first appears in the ref's manual. Sorry. I guess I should have been more thorough. Still, I'm not sure that I entirely agree with the errata version either. I'm wondering why Atmos is A+ instead of A-C, i.e. why should atmospheres D, E, and F cause oceans to be non-watery? I have another question about atmosphere type E. It assumes that the world is ellipsoidal (egg-shaped?), and that therefore the atmosphere pressures range from very high to very low depending on where you are on the planet's surface (since the atmosphere is still spherical) (see page 21 of ref's manual). Two questions: Is this realistic? Would is also apply to the hydrosphere? (if so, we could have a world mostly submerged but with two ends jutting like mammoth mountains out of the water, seems strange to me). _ /| Jim Vassilakos \`o_O' [email removed] ( ) [email removed] U [email removed] Aachk! [phone removed]