[email removed] (John Gonzalez) writes:
> So what exactly is the consensus on the 2-D starmaps? Are they supposed
> to be stereographic projections of real space?
The arguments I've heard go as follows:
A: 2D sucks, I use 3D
B: Yeah, but when you use 3D you have to throw out the Imperium and
all its history. I like the 2D, I rationalize it by saying that
jump space is 2D, and doesn't map directly into 3D.
C: I don't rationalize or worry. 2D maps are far more useful from a
playability standpoint. Ever try to map out 3D jump routes, or
have players flip through pages of maps just to "connect the
dots" on a 3D map?
A: Well, that's true, but I've had my computer at sessions, and
have it display the 3-space, and when I don't have the computer
around, I have a report listing all my systems. Each system
contains a list of other systems that can be reached with a J-1,
J-2, etc. Of course, I'm a computer enthusiast, and no-one else
can run this program effectively...
... and so on. Take your pick. Me, I'm in the C category. BTW, I've
shared this reply with the TML.
James
__ __/ / / Internet Traveller Mailing List, Administrator
/ / / / / James T. Perkins in Eugene, Oregon, USA
__/ __/__/__/ _____/ [email removed]