>> In Gvurrdon,
>> there is at least one multi-subsector TL-15 (!!) nation (The Rukh
>> Aeguezz). They could do some damage if they went "on the warpath"
>Yes, they could, but these large states have interests that aren't
>necessarily served by going to war with the Regency. Considering the
>inherent chaos of war the leaders of the larger Vargr states are
>probably even *more* reluctant to go to war - the resulting chaos might
>threaten their very existence.
I don't know how many of you are HIWG members, but those of you who are
will by looking through the back issues of AABP see that I have made
several changes to the Gvurrdon sector. Rukh and Anti-Rukh are long
gone. The new troublespots are the border between Thirz Empire and
Society of Equals. Anyone interested in getting data for Gvurrdon in TNE
please mail me a DD disk and I'll return it with whatever I got. (couple
of 100K) This information has been mailed to GDW. (And it would be nice
if you let me know that you have received it and looked at it [hint,
hint]). HIWG members may get this from Clay Bush.
>> (3) How do you "foster instability in the Extents"?
>Primairly through arms sales and other `assistance' to opposing forces.
>US has been doing an `excellent' job of this in Latin America for
>decades
I don't think Regency would foster instability in Gvurrdon. If whats
remaining of Gvurrdon falls to the Virus, it just mean that Regency have
to commit more resources to protect that border. And likewise with
Zhodani. In my campaign Thirz Empire is Zhodani backed, while what's
left of Thoengling are Imperial backed. And the zoo needs the stability
much as Regency needs it.
Roger "StarWolf" Myhre
Snailmail address:
Ammerudgrenda 168
0960 Oslo
Norway