Re: More MT Comments
In reply to #930 Re: More MT Comments by Tim Thomas
Replies:
- #949 Re: More MT Comments by Adrian Hurt
[This came to [email removed], looks like it was meant for [email removed]. Watch those automatic reply headers! -- James] Nick Sylvain ([email removed]) writes: [stuff deleted for brevity here] >this limitation ludicrous... (and I bet Field scouts would agree; they >would need some firepower to escape an unfriendly planet on occasion, >I'd think.) If you were a ship commander, would you want your security >troops to have a Gauss rifle (Penetration 7) or a Plasma or Fusion >weapon (Penetration 20 to 34). I wonder. :-) Weapon choice would obviously depend on the situation. Plasma or Fusion guns are usually a *BIG* no-no for repelling boarders. Unless the fighting is taking place in a very large cargo bay, the defenders will end up turning them- selves into crispy critters along with the attackers. There might also be a lot of unintended fatalities as bulkheads, decks, and the outside walls of the ship are inadvertently penetrated and people from both sides of the battle are sucked out through the resulting 3 meter holes. I will agree though, that P & F guns are great fun for dirtside use. Commanders should have HE weapons AND slug-throwers in their armories. Just my $0.02. /************************************************************************\ * John J. Wilber * "Life's a big fuck and money is the lubricant- * * [email removed] * without it, it hurts, and with it, it feels * * student, partier, and * really good." * * fun-loving guy. * JJW * \************************************************************************/ All opinions and material above is the responsibility of the originator. Submissions: [email removed], or [email removed] Administrator: [email removed] (James Perkins) The TML is made possible by facilities provided by Tektronix, Inc.