Re: Just add water
In reply to #1223 Just add water by William Dow Rieder
Replies:
- #1228 Re: Just add water by Dan Corrin
I didn't believe it until I checked it out myself. Yup, it works.
But why stop at water (OH2)? Let your imagination run wild.
Ammonia (NH3)
b.p. -28 deg. F (sorry about the English units, that's what
the book has).
Density, liq: 42.6 lb/ft^3 = .682 tons/m^3
%wt of Hydrogen: 17.65% (3/(14+1+1+1))
Density of Hydrogen: .120 tons/m^3
About 1.70 times the hydrogen in the same space.
(Density of H (LH2) is about .0708 tons/m^3)
(Water worked out to about 1.57 times the hydrogen)
Methane (CH4)
b.p. -164 deg. C (yup, these are in SI)
Density, liq: .5547 (not sure about this. The table
also says .466 next to the gas
phase, but that is awfully dense
for a gas).
%wt of Hydrogen: 25% (4/(12+1+1+1+1))
Density of Hydrogen: .1387 tons/m^3
About 1.96 times the hydrogen in the same space!
Wow, almost doubled capacity!
Hmm, just found ammonia on another chart that says its
liquid density is .7710 tons/m^3 which would give a H
density of .1358 tons/m^3 or 1.92 times capacity.
A quick check into the thermodynamic properties of
these three (water, ammonia , methane) says:
143 kJ/mole to split H2O into H2 and O2
15.4 kJ/mole to splie NH3 into N2 and H2
18.7 kJ/mole to split CH4 into H2 and C(graphite)
Looks like it should be easier to extract hydrogen from
methane and ammonia than water. Anyone know for sure?
I suspect methane is about the best you can do since it uses
four bonds with hydrogen--the normal maximum. Of course, there
might be some superdense liquid or really messed up bond structure
out there that I don't know about.
- --
John H. Kim
[email removed]
[email removed]