Re: Striker (2216)
In reply to #2216 Assorted Ramblings by Mark F. Cook
Replies:
- #2230 Re: (2223) Re: Striker (2216) by Peter L. Berghold
In TML biweekly V14#18, message 2216, Mark Cook [email removed] writes: > > 3. If not, is it still illegal for me to photocopy the game, or > > parts of it, and send them to the person who requested it? > Yes, but that's never stopped me. :-) I'm *not a lawyer*, and thus you *shouldn't believe me*, but as I understand the copyright law, it is perfectly legal to make a copy for personal use of a work which is (1) out-of-print, and (2) unavailable at a reasonable price. Thus, if you (Adrian) can't find a copy of the Striker rules at one of the places suggested on the list, you shouldn't feel guilty about copying it. Somebody should just try to get GDW's permission to photocopy the thing -- if they don't plan ever to publish it again, why should they mind? (Oh, I'm sure you creative souls will all think of good reasons -- it's just a rhetorical question :-). Bart Massey [email removed] "I've got so many lawyers working for me, I make Bell Labs look like an organization engaged in the business of making scientific discoveries." -- The Usenet Oracle