Re: FFW

"VSDEC::BARANSKI" [email removed] writes:
> RE: Adrian Hurt [email removed]
>					If we can't get a TCS game going, I
> will play FFW if we can find a referee...

As I hope I showed, a PBEM FFW game should be possible even without a
referee (although not as good, since "fog of war" would not be possible).

Hans Rancke-Madsen [email removed] writes:
> One of my friends ran a FFW pbm game for about 10 people by
> making them the top five Imperial and the top five Zhodani
> admirals respectively.
> ...
>
> What I'd like to do is to get 16-20 people involved: 2-3 top
> political and 4-5 top naval characters for the Domain, one each
> to run the Darrians, Sword Worlds, Border Worlds and Federation of
> Arden, 3 or 4 aslan clan chiefs (_rival_ Aslan clanchiefs ;-)), the
> Zhodani Governor of Chronor and whoever else I can think of (one
> Imperial would definitely be the admiral of the Five Sisters forces).

If you do, please count me in!  I ought to be able to handle Admiral
Santanocheev reasonably accurately. :-)  (For those of you who have
FFW, he's one of the ones with Plotting Factor 4, Tactical Factor -1.
For those of you who don't have FFW, this means the fleet is better
off with no admiral than with this one.  He also has the authority to
take command of any fleet that makes the mistake of coming near him.  :-)

Seriously though, I would be interested in such a game.  I would
probably be better as one of the minor characters (a lesser Imperial
admiral, or an Aslan or Vargr warlord), because of email lag times
due to me being in the U.K., and me not being next to a terminal 24
hours a day.

- --
 "Keyboard?  How quaint!" - M. Scott

 Adrian Hurt			     |	JANET:  [email removed]
 UUCP: ..!ukc!cs.hw.ac.uk!adrian     |  ARPA:   [email removed]