Re: Armed Aircraft
In reply to #4153 Re: Armed Aircraft by George W Herbert
George Herbert wrote a pretty good summary of the current state of US law concerning Weapons of Mass Destruction, but I'd like to clarify a few of his points. To buy and sell anti-tank guns, rocket launchers, etc., a person needs a Federal Firearms License. A Class III FFL allows one to deal in full auto firearms and a few other controlled devices. A Class II FFL, I believe, is what George is referring to when he spoke of being registered as an "Arms Dealer". However, a FFL is not required to own controlled weapons, only to sell them. There is some licensing and paperwork involved to buy a controlled device, but you don't have to be a registered dealer. A friend of mine buys C4 plastic explosives and shaped charges for his business, a oil well perforation service. He has to fill out a ton of papers, but he doesn't need an FFL to buy. Tanks and aircraft designed to carry weapons are not classed as weapons in themselves. Anyone can buy an M3 Stuart tank or a P-51 Mustang, sans weapons, no problem. What you have to do to disable the weapon carrying capability depends on the BATF's whim. I knew a group of WWII reenactors in Oklahoma City who bought a Wehrmacht surplus Hetzer tank destroyer from a museum in Switzerland in 1981. To legally import into the country, they had to have the breech block of the cannon cut in half to disable it. They had this pretty carefully done in Europe, then shipped it to all to Oklahoma, where they applied for a manufacture permit to enable the cannon. Once they had the permit from the BATF, they had the breech welded back together and they had a fully functional light tank destroyer to play with. Finding cannon shells to fire was a problem, though. What's happening today is that the BATF is making up its own rules as it goes along. If the BATF doesn't want to allow something, they simply restrict it, regardless of whether or not they have a legal basis to do so. For instance, there is an Executive order banning the import of a list of specific weapons into the US. The BATF has taken it upon itself to expand that list to include weapons are not restricted by the order. One dealer I've read of got clearance from the BATF to import a number of rifles, got them as far as a US Customs warehouse, then found that the BATF had changed its mind. The rifles are sitting in the warehouse, they are legal to import, but the BATF says no, we won't let you bring them in. Sue us. It's the same thing with the Soviet aircraft. There are no real legal restrictions on the aircraft or their systems, but the BATF is simply overreaching its authority in what it can control.