PIGS (sorry, Profits) IN SPACE..

A thread of 4 messages, 18 July 1991 to 23 July 1991, in the order they were sent.

#2630 PIGS (sorry, Profits) IN SPACE..

On Starship Economics, and the problem of how to make a profit in space :

> Steve Higginbotham writes

> In fact, that analysis  can  be  applied  to  EVERY  merchant  ship  ever
> designed  for  MT. Virtually all J-3 ships will tend to suck up money for
> generations. MOST J-2 ships will also. Given  that  the  J -2  ships  are
> primarily  passenger  ships,   with  adequate stewards, they can come out
> slightly ahead. They don't come out ahead of  the  savings  account,  but
> that  is  someone  else's  problem.  J -1 ships will mostly make a little
> money. They even make more money than a savings  account.  Not  quite  so
> much as most Money Market accounts, but, again someone else's problem.

This  is the problem everyone seems to be having with interstellar trade,
it's just too difficult to make a profit with the given freight costs.

> Cynthia has just suggested that passenger/freight fees could	be  raised.
> Possibly.   In   a   normal  economy,  doing	so  would  encourage  local
> development of resources, rather than  interstellar  trade.  More  people
> would  stay  home,  and ships would be in worse shape than ever. Besides,
> there are indications that the Imperium regulates passenger/freight  fees
> to the existing levels.

Well,  if  we  can't change the fees, maybe we should look at the problem
from a different angle :  A  highly  skilled  crew  can  make  reasonable
profits on speculative trade...

> As to the suggestion that the starships  operate  by	spec  trade  rather
> than	 freight  consignment,	this  IS  possible.  It  is  also  possible
> (probable, in fact) that  the  smart	investor  will	buy  the  stuff  up
> WITHOUT  pouring  money into a starship, and ship it as freight. Let some
> other fool lose money by buying a ship. There will always be	idiots	who
> go  broke  doing  this, who can be milked by an alert investor. Note that
> in the case of a  subsidized	route,	the  government  is  the  idiot  in
> question,  and  the  populace  is  the  entity  being milked by the alert
> investor.
> Therefore, most investors will NOT invest in a starship, which will  lose
> them	gobs  of  money, but rather make use of someone else's starship (so
> someone else can lose gobs of money, while  you  MAKE  gobs  of  money ).
> There  is  every indication (from the tables) that only a small ship (400
> tons or less) can make any significant amount of  money  by  spec  trade.
> Significant  in  terms of starship payments. If there was that much money
> to be made, Tukera would get an exclusive contract, and the profit  to  a
> starship owner would vanish.

The  assumptions  behind  this  is  that  there's  an unlimited supply of
starships available to transport your cargo wherever you want it  to  be,
but  given  the  costs  and  risks involved, no-one is going to be stupid
enough to run any such ship, let alone a plentiful supply of them.

> The  upshot  is  that no ship will ever make enough money to convince the
> buyer to buy it. So either there are NO ships,  or  the  government  buys
> and  runs  them  all, to the detriment of the private sector (read: PCs).
> Or we lower ship costs. Which we did.
> 					--- Steve & Cynthia Higginbotham

Somewhere in the Starship Operators Manual (I  think ),  there's  a  line
that  may  help  explain  this dilemma - It refers to the *reason* anyone
would be operating a starship in the first place, and says (paraphrased )
that  the  large  company ships don't make their profits on cargo, but on
transporting goods for their parent companies.

Looked at that way, the large companies use large starships because  they
can  get  cargos  cheaper  on some other planet, their passenger space is
used for moving their executives and employees, and  they  just  use  the
'standard'  freight and passenger charges to fill up unused spaces, which
wouldn't be making them any profit empty.

The same thing goes for small starships - Ok, so  It's  cheaper  to  have
someone  else  move the cargo on their starship, but they aren't going to
have a starship in the first place unless they're  intending  to  make  a
profit on it themselves by moving speculative cargo's.

This  means  there  can be lots of smaller free and far-traders shuttling
back and forth, only taking regular freight when they can't  find  enough
speculative  cargo.  The  free  traders  are  there because the planetary
governments want people who haven't got access to their own  starship  to
have a chance to make some money too - then they can tax them :-)

As  Steve  says,  there  are  NO ships, at least none that are willing to
carry your freight at a worthless 1000 Cr/ton :

"You want the stuff shifted, get your own ******** starship !"

Unless, of course, I've missed something in the rules about how  easy  it
is to find someone to move your freight for you (sigh).

That's  the  way  I've  always  seen Traveller trade working, but I can't
explain the passenger spaces  found  in  the  'standard'  designs  (small
traders)  though -  it's  easier  to  make a profit by converting it into
more cargo space,  given a highly skilled  crew.  Anybody  else  got  any
ideas ?

> P.S. Does anybody remember the cheap "standard" hulls from Old  Traveller
> Book 2? And the cheap A & B jump drives? Where did those go? And why?

Yes, I remember them - much cheaper if you  could  fit  what  you  wanted
into them. I guess they just didn't fit with the new design rules.

Personally,   I'm   all  in  favour  of  making  the  starships  cheaper,
especially the computers - Price/size per tech level, like  the  rest  of
it.
				Simon Anderson

#2632 Re: (2630) PIGS (sorry, Profits) IN SPACE..

> Date: Thu, 18 Jul 91 21:14:37 WET DST
> From: Simon Anderson [email removed]
> Subject: (2630) PIGS (sorry, Profits) IN SPACE..
>
> That's  the  way  I've  always  seen Traveller trade working, but I can't
> explain the passenger spaces  found  in  the  'standard'  designs  (small
> traders)  though -  it's  easier  to  make a profit by converting it into
> more cargo space,  given a highly skilled  crew.  Anybody  else  got  any
> ideas ?
>

For merchants operating on a government subsidy, I've always assumed that there
is a government regulation requiring a certain amount of cargo space, since
free flow of people = free flow of ideas = a good thing (at least in theory).

For smaller ships, well, they are they because they have always been there since
the beginning of the game.  They do have the effect of offering a better return
on investment than cargo at 1000cr/ton, and thus might help keep you in 'air
money', and they have the pleasant effect (for the GM) of keeping the players
worried about hijackings and offering other adventure hooks.  Still, you're
quite right...a trader with the right skills would be better off without them,
and I have designed several small 'cargo only' merchants.

Rob Dean

#2639 re: Starship Economics

Simon Anderson writes:

> The same thing goes for small starships - Ok, so  It's  cheaper  to  have
> someone  else  move the cargo on their starship, but they aren't going to
> have a starship in the first place unless they're  intending  to  make  a
> profit on it themselves by moving speculative cargo's.

> This  means  there  can be lots of smaller free and far-traders shuttling
> back and forth, only taking regular freight when they can't  find  enough
> speculative  cargo.  The  free  traders  are  there because the planetary
> governments want people who haven't got access to their own  starship  to
> have a chance to make some money too - then they can tax them :-)

No, that is the niche filled by the Subsidized Merchant (the ones the
Government pays for and runs).  They provide the grunt service for all those
investors without a starship of their own.

The free/far trader guys are the ones who go to the bank to ask for a loan:

Capt Helsson (free trader captain wannabe):  "Sir, I would like to borrow
MCr30 to buy a starship."

Mr. Carcharias (vice president in charge of the Loan Dept):  "Well, that's
fine.  We like to see young people go into business for themselves.  Can you
show me your business plan, please?"

Capt Helsson:  "Well, sir, I was planning on gambling on my inherent genius to
come out ahead in this operation."

Mr Carcharias:  "Hmmm...  Why don't we talk about this AFTER you can show me a
detailed plan to make enough money to pay us back.  We don't normally
subsidize trips to Vegas to play roulette."

<  later  >

Mr Carcharias:  "well, sir, it is good to see you again!  What can I do for
you today?"

< capt Helsson hands Mr Carcharias business plan.  Mr Carcharias studies it
while Helsson talks. >

Capt Helsson:  "Sir, you asked me for a business plan.  I have one here.  I
have information that the new source of pharmaceuticals in District 268 will
produce a large, steady demand for starship transportation to markets.  As you
can see, my plan is built around the idea of purchasing the drugs on site, and
transporting them to markets to exchange them for goods the producers need
<blah, blah, blah............>

< Mr Carcharias sets down plans and smiles broadly >

Mr Carcharias:  " well, that is good news.  This is just the kind of plan we
like to see before we release our money into a long term loan.  And, if your
estimates are correct, you should be able to pay the loan back within 15
years.  That really is well thought out, sir.  we shall, of course, have to
process the paperwork, which should take no more than a few weeks, but I can
assure you that your loan will be approved as written."

Capt Helsson: < rising >  "thank you, sir.  I really appreciate that.  I'll be
back to sign the paperwork as soon as it is completed."

Mr Carcharias : < also rising > "Sir, it is a pleasure.  My secretary will
call you within two weeks to finalize the agreements."

< Helsson leaves >

Mr Carcharias:  < to secretary > "Doris, can you ring up Thor Tukera for me,
please?"

< phone rings, Carcharias answers.>

Mr Carcharias:  "Thor, I just heard a reliable rumor that there is a lot of
money to be had in a new route down in District 268.  If you could release a
few long-liners to duty there, we could make a bundle.  And, as a bonus, there
should be several nearly new merchant ships, all quite well designed,
available there in the next few months.  Quite reasonable prices, too, I
should think...  Of course I'll send the details to your office, this very
afternoon.  Good talking to you, Thor.  BTW, what is my dividend on my
personal Tukera stock expected to be this quarter?  That high?  EXCELLENT.
Good day, Thor."

Mr Carcharias:  < to Doris >  "Please expedite that young man's application,
Doris.  We wouldn't want to disappoint him.  Or Tukera."


Notes:

	1) If a good spec trade route already exists, a major corporation will
have it tied up solidly.

	2) Ownership of the major mega-corporations is so interlocked (source:
MegaTraveller) is so interlocked, they might as well be considered to have
identical interests.  This includes Hortalez et Cie, THE major banking
interest and source of starship loans in the Imperium, as well as most lesser
banks.

	3) Purely local banks are unlikely to finance a purchase involving
removal of the borrower and the collateral some months travel beyond their
reach, which is why Hortalez is the main source of starship loans.

	4) Assuming your business plan is based on speculative trade, it will
mostly likely be a newly profitable route.  If the route continues to be
profitable, in the long run Tukera or a similar large shipping firm will
undoubtably move in and take it over.

	5) Given: you have to explain your route to the lending agency.  Given:
the lending agency is a part-owner or is owned by Tukera or other major
shipping firm, it is not unreasonable that the lending agency might inform its
parent of any potentially profitable leads that it acquires.  A secret shared
is no longer a secret.

	6) It is also not unreasonable that the lending agency will make a loan
in spite of the fact that it knows that no profit will be made and the
starship will be repossessed.  This is because they can then sell the starship
to Tukera or whoever at a breakeven price for the bank, and at a considerable
profit for Tukera.  The only loser is the poor schmuck who got the loan.

	7) This happens in the real world.  In the U.S., we have Anti-Trust Laws
and insider trading regulations, etc to prevent this sort of thing.  However,
indications are that the Imperium does not interfere in business to that
extent, especially since the imperial family and the high nobility are
significant stockholders in said megacorporations.  Expect such scenarios to
be even more common in Margaret's Imperium.

	Again, the upshot is that, given the *present* pricing scheme, in the
Imperium, most commercial starships will be owned by the government in the
form of subsidized merchants, or government-protected in the form of
megacorporate ships.  Is this the picture of the Imperium that you want?


					--- Steve & Cynthia

#2669 Starship Ecomomics

More on MegaCorps ...

Cynthia Higginbotham writes :
[On why Megacorps have all the trade in the galaxy tied up.]

> 1) If a good spec trade route already exists, a  major  corporation  will
> have it tied up solidly.

This would mean that the megacorps  spend  most  of  their  resources  on
keeping  hold  of all the speculative trade routes, routes that are going
to shift & change at the whim of their customers. To  quote  you  from  a
previous article

> Subject: (2617) starship prices & economics

> Steve Higginbotham:

> There  is  every indication (from the tables) that only a small ship (400
> tons or less) can make any significant amount of  money  by  spec  trade.
> Significant  in  terms of starship payments. If there was that much money
> to be made, Tukera would get an exclusive contract, and the profit  to  a
> starship owner would vanish.

The  problem  with  speculative trade, from a Megacorps point of view, is
that it doesn't involve a regular, reliable supply and demand. It's  made
up  of  lots  of  little  cargoes,  which  may not be available twice and
involve certain risks. They're unlikely to fetch the same price twice  on
the  same planet - it takes a skilled crew to make significant profits on
such deals.

If a Megacorporation wanted to make a profit  from  the  differing  trade
classifications  of  two  planets,  it  would  set  up a regular run, buy
manufacturing capacity on the source world and set up retail  outlets  on
the  destination  world (s ). That's what Megacorps do, it lets them ship
thousands of tons of cargo in big ships and make real profits.

With such a profitable business  to  engage  in,  why  then  should  they
divert  valuable  skilled  employees, who could make them much more money
elsewhere, to small speculative trade runs which would cover the cost  of
the  starship  in  a few decades ? That's not to say they don't make some
use of free traders for checking  out  new  markets  - the  free  traders
given  as  retirement  bonuses  are  clear  evidence  of  their buying up
bankrupt merchants and using them for a while,  but  the  way  they  give
them  away seems to show that they aren't using them as a major source of
income - It's easier to give a leftover ship to an ex-captain  who  wants
to continue to do a little trading, and collect the payments from him.

> 4) Assuming your business plan is based on  speculative  trade,  it  will
> mostly  likely be a newly profitable route.  If the route continues to be
> profitable, in the long run Tukera or a similar large shipping firm  will
> undoubtably move in and take it over.

That  doesn't  mean  the  route  will  no longer be profitable. The goods
available for speculative  trade  represent  the  'spare'  output  of  an
entire  planet,  which  would  take hundreds of large ships to move, even
assuming the planetary government  would  let  a  single  megacorporation
take  over every manufacturing business, and the destination planets that
are prepared to pay enough for these goods for them to be profitable  are
likely  to  want  *anything*  the source planet is selling, so a megacorp
buying up all the air-raft spares (for instance) is  unlikely  to  affect
the market for, say, military weapons.

> 5) Given: you have to explain your route to the  lending  agency.  Given:
> the  lending  agency is a part-owner or is owned by Tukera or other major
> shipping firm, it is not  unreasonable  that  the  lending  agency  might
> inform  its  parent of any potentially profitable leads that it acquires.
> A secret shared is no longer a secret.

Speculative  trade  routes  aren't  secret -  anyone checking through the
planetary trade classifications can see which planets will sell  low  and
which  are  likely  to  buy  high. The very nature of the small ships and
small individual cargoes used for such trade means that the  markets  can
never get too much of the goods.

> 6) It is also not unreasonable that the lending agency will make  a  loan
> in  spite  of  the fact that it knows that no profit will be made and the
> starship will be repossessed. This is because  they  can  then  sell  the
> starship  to  Tukera or whoever at a breakeven price for the bank, and at
> a considerable profit for Tukera. The only loser is the poor schmuck  who
> got the loan.

The  real  looser from such a deal would be the bank. The person (s ) who
got the loan loose their 20% deposit (or  whatever  ),  small  change  to
everyone  but  them, the Megacorp gets a starship at a price certainly no
less than they could  have  had  it  build  for,  and  the  bank  gets  a
reputation  for double-crossing it's customers. That bank can't close and
start trading under another name, it can't keep insider dealing  on  such
a  scale a secret, and it's reputation is linked to the megacorps who own
it.

> 7)  This  happens in the real world. In the U.S., we have Anti-Trust Laws
> and insider trading regulations, etc  to  prevent  this  sort  of  thing.
> However,   indications  are  that  the  Imperium  does  not  interfere in
> business to that extent, especially since the  imperial  family  and  the
> high  nobility  are  significant  stockholders  in said megacorporations.
> Expect such scenarios to be even more common in Margaret's Imperium.

The Imperium doesn't interfere  with  interstellar  trade  and  commerce,
that's  left  to  the  individual  planetary  governments.  The  problems
imposed on megacorps by such governments are  completely  different  from
those  faced  by  independent  free  traders.  The  only  limitations  on
megacorps are how much of each planet it's government will let them  buy.
They  can  afford  to build as many ships as they can make a profit with,
they have the organisation to sell goods  produced  on  one  world  on  a
dozen  others,  and  so  they  can  specialise and use bulk-production to
lower costs and raise profits.

But such a setup would make each planet dependent on the  output  of  all
those  others it received goods from, and especially on the megacorp that
found markets for all it's goods and supplied all it's needs.

Such an arrangement might well benefit the planets involved, raise  their
living  standards  and  encourage  interstellar peace and harmony as each
planet found their ideal place in the orderly interstellar empire.

But how many planetary governments are going to sell  their  planet  into
what  would  effectively  be  slavery,  giving  a megacorp control of any
significant portion of their economy would give  that  megacorp  leverage
to  push for whatever it wanted, and there would be no hope of assistance
from  the  Imperium  - It  doesn't  interfere  in   interstellar   trade,
remember.  And if the Megacorps banks have been ripping people off to get
the deposits they paid for their free-traders, how trustworthy are  these
people who say they want to help run your planet ?

> Again,  the  upshot  is that, given the *present * pricing scheme, in the
> Imperium, most commercial starships will be owned by  the  government  in
> the  form of subsidized merchants, or government-protected in the form of
> megacorporate ships. Is this the picture of the Imperium that you want?
>--- Steve & Cynthia

The  present  pricing scheme is only applicable to small free traders, it
says nothing about megacorps being able to buy up *all * the  speculative
cargo  at the same prices. It does demonstrate that free traders can make
a speculative profit if they're good at what they do, which is what  it's
there for.

"What's  that  Mr Carcharias ? The pharmaceuticals in District 268 ? Yes,
we'd already tried for an exculsive contract, but their government  won't
touch  us  after  you  stole  so  many  of their peoples money in crooked
starship deals.  They  said  they  preferred  not  to  give  a  bunch  of
criminals  control  of  their  economy,  even when we bribed the heads of
state, their police took a week to quiet the riots after  they  announced
the  deal,  so  they  had  to  call it off. Your methods of operation are
becomming a liablity, stock dividends from new business  have  fallen and
I'm afraid the banks going to have to let you go. Goodbye Mr Carcharias."

		Simon Anderson